Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

re-motion is dually licensed. You can have a commercial license for re-motion (includes support and more). This usually costs money, because it involves support or project work. There is a wikipedia article on the subject. There is a wikipedia article on the subject.

However, all of re-motion is also available under common variants of the GPL wikipedia. The GPL itself is not used in re-motion at the time of this writing; most of it is covered by a more consumer-friendly, less-strings-attached license.

...

The following re-motion components are licensed under the LGPL. (Or,
actually, dually licensed. The LGPL is one of two options here.)

Other parts of re-motion are covered by the Affero GNU public license (AGPL). This license is like the GPL, with an important difference: providing running instances of AGPLed software over a network is treated like "distribution" (in contrast to the GPL, where it is not).

The security module re-strict is licensed under the AGPL. (Or, actually, dually licensed. The AGPL is one of two options here.)

The security module re-strict is licensed under the AGPL. (Or, actually, dually licensed. The AGPL is one of two options here.)

The consequence: if you provide modified AGPLed software as a web service (for example) you must share your modifications. (wikipedia.)

Here is the list of related wikipedia articles: